On 12/05/2013 11:27 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Friday 06 December 2013 05:00 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 12/05/2013 03:57 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>> From: Ashwini Ghuge <aghuge@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> This adds a driver for the Tegra124 pinmux, and required >>> parameterization data for Tegra124. >>> >>> The driver uses the common Tegra pincontrol driver utility >>> functions to implement the majority of the driver. >>> >>> This driver is not compatible with the earlier NVIDIA's SoCs, >>> hence add new compatibile as "nvidia,tegra124-pinmux". >>> >>> Originally written by Ashwini Gguhe. >>> ldewangan: >>> - cleanup the patches, >>> - Fix address issue. ... >> (BTW, those 2 patches would go through the pinctrl tree, and patches 2/4 >> and 3/4 would go through the Tegra tree. You generally shouldn't posted >> patches that will be applied to different trees in the same series, >> since there aren't dependencies). > > Fine. > Should I sent the diff or full change? I think full change as this need > to go on pincontrol subsystem, not in Tegra. Please send complete patches for the new driver. The patch I have in my local tree isn't going anywhere; I just have the early version that Ashwini posted applied locally for testing. A final complete patch should be sent to the pinctrl maintainer in the normal way. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
