On 10/28/2016 11:36 AM, James Liao wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Sorry for late reply due to our email service.
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 16:04 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
Hi James,
On 10/20/2016 10:56 AM, James Liao wrote:
-static int scpsys_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static void init_clks(struct platform_device *pdev, struct clk *clk[CLK_MAX])
I prefer struct clk **clk.
Okay.
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = CLK_NONE + 1; i < CLK_MAX; i++)
+ clk[i] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, clk_names[i]);
+}
+
+static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ const struct scp_domain_data *scp_domain_data, int num)
{
struct genpd_onecell_data *pd_data;
struct resource *res;
- int i, j, ret;
+ int i, j;
struct scp *scp;
- struct clk *clk[MT8173_CLK_MAX];
+ struct clk *clk[CLK_MAX];
should be *[CLK_MAX - 1] but I would prefer to define in the enum:
CLK_MAX = CLK_VENC_LT,
After init_clks() the clk[] will have valid contents between
clk[1]..clk[CLK_MAX-1], so it's necessary to declare clk[] with CLK_MAX
elements.
If you are ok with it, I can fix both of my comments when applying.
Yes. struct clk **clk can be applied directly. But I think clk[CLK_MAX]
should be kept in current implementation.
Ok, we won't never use clk[0] but it's ok for now.
Applied to v4.9-next/soc
Best regards,
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
