Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] of: introduce the overlay manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Antoine,

> On Oct 26, 2016, at 17:57 , Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> The overlay manager is an in-kernel library helping to handle dt overlay
> loading when using capes.
> 

Code related comments

> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/of/Kconfig                           |   2 +
> drivers/of/Makefile                          |   1 +
> drivers/of/overlay-manager/Kconfig           |   6 +
> drivers/of/overlay-manager/Makefile          |   1 +
> drivers/of/overlay-manager/overlay-manager.c | 199 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/overlay-manager.h              |  38 +++++
> 6 files changed, 247 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/of/overlay-manager/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/of/overlay-manager/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/of/overlay-manager/overlay-manager.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/overlay-manager.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> index bc07ad30c9bf..e57aeaf0bf4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> @@ -116,4 +116,6 @@ config OF_OVERLAY
> config OF_NUMA
> 	bool
> 
> +source "drivers/of/overlay-manager/Kconfig"
> +
> endif # OF
> diff --git a/drivers/of/Makefile b/drivers/of/Makefile
> index d7efd9d458aa..d738fd41271f 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/of/Makefile
> @@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += overlay.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_OF_NUMA) += of_numa.o
> 
> obj-$(CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST) += unittest-data/
> +obj-y += overlay-manager/
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay-manager/Kconfig b/drivers/of/overlay-manager/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..eeb76054dcb8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay-manager/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +config OF_OVERLAY_MGR
> +	bool "Device Tree Overlay Manager"
> +	depends on OF_OVERLAY
> +	help
> +	  Enable the overlay manager to handle automatic overlay loading when
> +	  devices are detected.
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay-manager/Makefile b/drivers/of/overlay-manager/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..86d2b53950e7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay-manager/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY_MGR)			+= overlay-manager.o
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay-manager/overlay-manager.c b/drivers/of/overlay-manager/overlay-manager.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a725d7e24d38
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay-manager/overlay-manager.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 - Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/firmware.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
> +#include <linux/overlay-manager.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +
> +struct overlay_mgr_overlay {
> +	struct list_head list;
> +	char *name;
> +};
> +
> +LIST_HEAD(overlay_mgr_overlays);
> +LIST_HEAD(overlay_mgr_formats);
> +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(overlay_mgr_lock);
> +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(overlay_mgr_format_lock);
> +

Is there a reason for using spinlocks here? OF uses a mutex for
locking since we don’t expect OF manipulation occurring in a
non schedulable context.

> +/*
> + * overlay_mgr_register_format()
> + *
> + * Adds a new format candidate to the list of supported formats. The registered
> + * formats are used to parse the headers stored on the dips.
> + */
> +int overlay_mgr_register_format(struct overlay_mgr_format *candidate)
> +{
> +	struct overlay_mgr_format *format;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&overlay_mgr_format_lock);
> +
> +	/* Check if the format is already registered */
> +	list_for_each_entry(format, &overlay_mgr_formats, list) {
> +		if (!strcpy(format->name, candidate->name)) {
> +			err = -EEXIST;
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	list_add_tail(&candidate->list, &overlay_mgr_formats);
> +
> +err:
> +	spin_unlock(&overlay_mgr_format_lock);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(overlay_mgr_register_format);
> +
> +/*
> + * overlay_mgr_parse()
> + *
> + * Parse raw data with registered format parsers. Fills the candidate string if
> + * one parser understood the raw data format.
> + */
> +int overlay_mgr_parse(struct device *dev, void *data, char ***candidates,
> +		      unsigned *n)
> +{

The two argument format is not very readable. Perhaps use a structure instead?

> +	struct list_head *pos, *tmp;
> +	struct overlay_mgr_format *format;
> +
> +	list_for_each_safe(pos, tmp, &overlay_mgr_formats) {
> +		format = list_entry(pos, struct overlay_mgr_format, list);
> +
> +		format->parse(dev, data, candidates, n);
> +		if (n > 0)
> +			return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(overlay_mgr_parse);
> +
> +static int overlay_mgr_check_overlay(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +	struct property *p;
> +	const char *str = NULL;
> +
> +	p = of_find_property(node, "compatible", NULL);
> +	if (!p)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	do {
> +		str = of_prop_next_string(p, str);
> +		if (of_machine_is_compatible(str))
> +			return 0;

I think this is very similar to the way of_match_node works.
Find a way to use that instead?

> +	} while (str);
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * _overlay_mgr_insert()
> + *
> + * Try to request and apply an overlay given a candidate name.
> + */
> +static int _overlay_mgr_apply(struct device *dev, char *candidate)
> +{
> +	struct overlay_mgr_overlay *overlay;
> +	struct device_node *node;
> +	const struct firmware *firmware;
> +	char *firmware_name;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&overlay_mgr_lock);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(overlay, &overlay_mgr_overlays, list) {
> +		if (!strcmp(overlay->name, candidate)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "overlay already loaded\n");
> +			err = -EEXIST;
> +			goto err_lock;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	overlay = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*overlay), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!overlay) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_lock;
> +	}
> +

spinlock and possibly sleeping?

> +	overlay->name = candidate;
> +
> +	firmware_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "overlay-%s.dtbo", candidate);
> +	if (!firmware_name) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto err_free;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_info(dev, "requesting firmware '%s'\n", firmware_name);
> +
> +	err = request_firmware_direct(&firmware, firmware_name, dev);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_info(dev, "failed to request firmware '%s'\n",
> +			 firmware_name);
> +		goto err_free;
> +	}
> +

Same here.

> +	of_fdt_unflatten_tree((unsigned long *)firmware->data, NULL, &node);
> +	if (!node) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to unflatted tree\n");
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto err_fw;
> +	}
> +
> +	of_node_set_flag(node, OF_DETACHED);
> +
> +	err = of_resolve_phandles(node);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to resolve phandles: %d\n", err);
> +		goto err_fw;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = overlay_mgr_check_overlay(node);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "overlay checks failed: %d\n", err);
> +		goto err_fw;
> +	}
> +
> +	err = of_overlay_create(node);
> +	if (err < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to create overlay: %d\n", err);
> +		goto err_fw;
> +	}
> +
> +	list_add_tail(&overlay->list, &overlay_mgr_overlays);
> +
> +	dev_info(dev, "loaded firmware '%s'\n", firmware_name);
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&overlay_mgr_lock);
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_fw:
> +	release_firmware(firmware);
> +err_free:
> +	devm_kfree(dev, overlay);
> +err_lock:
> +	spin_unlock(&overlay_mgr_lock);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +int overlay_mgr_apply(struct device *dev, char **candidates, unsigned n)
> +{
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	for (i=0; i < n; i++) {
> +		ret = _overlay_mgr_apply(dev, candidates[i]);
> +		if (!ret)
> +			return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(overlay_mgr_apply);
> diff --git a/include/linux/overlay-manager.h b/include/linux/overlay-manager.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8adcc4f5ddf6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/overlay-manager.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 - Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __OVERLAY_MGR_H__
> +#define __OVERLAY_MGR_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> +
> +#define OVERLAY_MGR_DIP_MAX_SZ		SZ_128
> +
> +struct overlay_mgr_format {
> +	struct list_head list;
> +	char *name;
> +	int (*parse)(struct device *dev, void *data, char ***candidates,
> +		     unsigned *n);
> +};
> +
> +int overlay_mgr_register_format(struct overlay_mgr_format *candidate);
> +int overlay_mgr_parse(struct device *dev, void *data, char ***candidates,
> +		      unsigned *n);
> +int overlay_mgr_apply(struct device *dev, char **candidates, unsigned n);
> +
> +#define dip_convert(field)                                      \
> +        (                                                       \
> +                (sizeof(field) == 1) ? field :                  \
> +                (sizeof(field) == 2) ? be16_to_cpu(field) :     \
> +                (sizeof(field) == 4) ? be32_to_cpu(field) :     \
> +                -1                                              \
> +        )
> +
> +#endif /* __OVERLAY_MGR_H__ */
> -- 
> 2.10.1
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux