On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:49:29AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > I agree - something like this should have attracted more reviews. I > suggest providing a better explanation, i.e what you are doing and why > in more details. I reviewed your set and I'm still not sure of > exactly what it does, hence not being able to comment on the validity > of the approach. > > I'm pretty sure there is value in what you are suggesting, it's a > matter of getting people to understand the approach and motivation. That's what I tried to do in the cover-letter. What do you think is missing that I should add in it? Thanks, Antoine -- Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
