On 10/27/2016 04:02 AM, Tero Kristo wrote: > On 27/10/16 01:04, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:33:45PM -0500, Dave Gerlach wrote: >>> Add a generic power domain implementation, TI SCI PM Domains, that >>> will hook into the genpd framework and allow the TI SCI protocol to >>> control device power states. >>> >>> Also, provide macros representing each device index as understood >>> by TI SCI to be used in the device node power-domain references. >>> These are identifiers for the K2G devices managed by the PMMC. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@xxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/sci-pm-domain.txt | 54 +++++++++++++ >>> MAINTAINERS | 2 + >>> include/dt-bindings/genpd/k2g.h | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/sci-pm-domain.txt >>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/genpd/k2g.h >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/sci-pm-domain.txt >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/sci-pm-domain.txt >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 000000000000..32f38a349656 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/sci-pm-domain.txt >>> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ >>> +Texas Instruments TI-SCI Generic Power Domain >>> +--------------------------------------------- >>> + >>> +Some TI SoCs contain a system controller (like the PMMC, etc...) that is >>> +responsible for controlling the state of the IPs that are present. >>> +Communication between the host processor running an OS and the system >>> +controller happens through a protocol known as TI-SCI [1]. This pm domain >>> +implementation plugs into the generic pm domain framework and makes use of >>> +the TI SCI protocol power on and off each device when needed. >>> + >>> +[1] Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.txt >>> + >>> +PM Domain Node >>> +============== >>> +The PM domain node represents the global PM domain managed by the PMMC, >>> +which in this case is the single implementation as documented by the generic >>> +PM domain bindings in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt. >>> + >>> +Required Properties: >>> +-------------------- >>> +- compatible: should be "ti,sci-pm-domain" >>> +- #power-domain-cells: Must be 0. >>> +- ti,sci: Phandle to the TI SCI device to use for managing the devices. >>> + >>> +Example: >>> +-------------------- >>> +k2g_pds: k2g_pds { >>> + compatible = "ti,sci-pm-domain"; >>> + #power-domain-cells = <0>; >>> + ti,sci = <&pmmc>; >>> +}; >> >> Why not just make the PMMC node be the power-domain provider itself? If >> not that, then make this a child node of it. The same comment applies to >> all the SCI functions, but I guess I've already acked some of them. > > This seems to be a bug in this documentation actually. ti,sci handle is no > longer supported, and all the sci stuff must be under the parent sci node. > >> >> I really don't like reviewing all these TI SCI bindings one by one. Each >> one on its own seems fine, but I don't see the full picture. > > The full picture is represented under the documentation for the main protocol > support itself. See this patch: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9383281/ > > Copy pasted here as ref: > > Example (K2G): > ------------- > pmmc: pmmc { > compatible = "ti,k2g-sci"; > ... > > my_clk_node: clk_node { > ... > ... > }; > > my_pd_node: pd_node { > ... > ... > }; > }; > > Yes my bad I will fix this in V3 once we straighten out the ID portion of the binding. Regards, Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html