On 26 October 2016 19:59 Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 05:56:39PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote: > > From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > +static const struct of_device_id da9062_compatible_id_table[] = { > > + { .compatible = "dlg,da9062-watchdog", .data = &da9062_watchdog_info }, > > + { }, > > +}; > > + > > static int da9062_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > int ret; > > struct da9062 *chip; > > struct da9062_watchdog *wdt; > > + const struct of_device_id *match; > > > > chip = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); > > if (!chip) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > + match = of_match_node(da9062_compatible_id_table, > > + pdev->dev.of_node); > > + if (!match) > > + return -ENXIO; > > + > > wdt = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*wdt), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!wdt) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > wdt->hw = chip; > > > > - wdt->wdtdev.info = &da9062_watchdog_info; > > + wdt->wdtdev.info = (const struct watchdog_info *)match->data; > > I don't see why you would need match->data or of_match_node above. Hi Guenter, True. I do not need to do any matching on the table any more if the assumption is to use a fall-back compatible string for DA9061 devices (to use the da9062 device driver). I can erase most of that content. Including the .data = &da9062_watchdog_info. Regards, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html