* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [161025 10:20]: > > > Am 25.10.2016 um 18:51 schrieb Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>: > > > > On 10/25/2016 07:48 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi > >> index b04adee..91456b4 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi > >> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ > >> compatible = "ti,abe-twl6040"; > >> ti,model = "omap5-uevm"; > >> > >> + ti,jack_detection; > > > > ti,jack-detection > > Hm. Looks as if we have found another bug: > which one is correct? > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/omap-abe-twl6040.txt#n15 > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/sound/soc/omap/omap-abe-twl6040.c#n289 > > Should I add another patch? We have parts of omap-abe-twl6040.txt, the driver and omap4-sdp.dts all using ti,jack-detection. So omap-abe-twl6040.txt is wrong for the use of ti,jack_detection. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
