Re: [PATCH V2 1/8] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On certain platforms (like TI), DVFS for a single device (CPU) requires
> configuring multiple power supplies.
> 
> The OPP bindings already contains binding and example to explain this
> case, but it isn't sufficient. For example, there is no way for the code
> parsing these bindings to know which voltage values belong to which
> power supply. Also its not possible to know the order in which the
> supplies need to be configured while switching OPPs.
> 
> This patch tries to clarify on those details and does some minor changes
> as well.
> 
> Note that the bindings do not specify the order in which the regulators
> need to be programmed and the order in which the entries are added for
> the supplies.
> 
> The user of the bindings (like the kernel) shall know these details
> already and the DT is responsible to supply only the readings for the
> regulators.
> 
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux