On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:21:10AM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote: > +- hisilicon,erratum-161x01 : A boolean property. Indicates the presence of > + QorIQ erratum 161201, which says that reading the counter is > + unreliable unless the small range of value is returned by back-to-back reads. > + This also affects writes to the tval register, due to the implicit > + counter read. Is "161x01" the *exact* erratum number, or is the 'x' a wildcard? Please use the *exact* erratum number, even if that means we have to list several. Is "161x01" an *erratum* number, or the *part* number of affected devices? Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html