On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 07:06:08AM -0700, Sinan Kaya wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > On 10/20/2016 2:48 AM, Vinod Koul wrote: > >> 6: > >> > * rebase 4.9 kernel > > Why??? > > > > This is more for me. There is nothing special about 4.9 that impacts hidma. > It just means that I retested the code against 4.9-rc1 kernel. > > > > > I already told you that I have applied 6 in the last version, please dont > > send me stuff which is already applied :( > > I couldn't find your applied branch on git yesterday. That's why, I sent you > the whole thing so that you can pick the last 4 ones. You don't need to reapply > the first 6. Better to have everything than missing code. > > slave-dma git://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma.git (fetch) > slave-dma git://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma.git (push) You seem to have missed topic/qcom which I pushed last night. next would have worked too!! > If you prefer a reduced list, please make your current changelist available on > one of the branches on git, I can reapply, test and send only the remaining ones. > > Sinan > > -- > Sinan Kaya > Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. > Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
