On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 12:21:30PM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 11:48:24 +0200
> Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > This patch add support for the sunxi-sid driver to the device tree for sun8i-h3.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> > index 9f58bb4..abfd29c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> > @@ -211,6 +211,11 @@
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> > };
> >
> > + sid: eeprom@01c14200 {
> > + compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-sid";
> > + reg = <0x01c14200 0x200>;
>
> The datasheet says 1Kb starting at 0x01c14000.
> Is there any reason to reduce the area and to shift the offset?
>
According to http://linux-sunxi.org/SID_Register_Guide "For Allwinner A83T and H3 the SID address space starts at 0x01c14000, and the e-fuses are at offset 0x200".
So I use this offset, since the sunxi_sid driver need the base address of e-fuses.
The easiest solution is to use 0x01c14200 since the other part of sid is not used and not known (A83T/H3 user manual doesnt give any information on all sid space, worse for A64 which reference SID only in memory map).
So probably for H3/A64/A83T, there will never any usage of the rest of the SID address space.
Regards
Corentin Labbe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
