Hello,
On Monday 17 Oct 2016 10:33:58 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 17/10/16 10:12, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Monday 17 October 2016 11:26 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>>> On 15/10/16 20:42, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>>>> index f79e1b9..32908ae 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -399,6 +420,14 @@
>>>>> <&edma0 0 1>;
>>>>> dma-names = "tx", "rx";
>>>>> };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + display: display@213000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "ti,am33xx-tilcdc", "ti,da850-tilcdc";
>>>>
>>>> This should instead be:
>>>>
>>>> compatible = "ti,da850-tilcdc", "ti,am33xx-tilcdc";
>>>>
>>>> as the closest match should appear first in the list.
>>>
>>> Actually I don't think that's correct. The LCDC on da850 is not
>>> compatible with the LCDC on AM335x. I think it should be just
>>> "ti,da850-tilcdc".
>>
>> So if "ti,am33xx-tilcdc" is used, the display wont work at all? If thats
>> the case, I wonder how the patch passed testing. Bartosz?
>
> AM3 has "version 2" of LCDC, whereas DA850 is v1. They are quite
> similar, but different.
>
> The driver gets the version number from LCDC's register, and acts based
> on that, so afaik the compatible string doesn't really affect the
> functionality (as long as it matches).
>
> But even if it works with the current driver, I don't think
> "ti,am33xx-tilcdc" and "ti,da850-tilcdc" are compatible in the HW level.
If the hardware provides IP revision information, how about just "ti,lcdc" ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
