On 2016/10/11 18:16, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:44:20AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >> On 2016/9/1 14:55, Zhen Lei wrote: >>> If HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is selected, and some memoryless numa nodes are >>> actually exist. The percpu variable areas and numa control blocks of that >>> memoryless numa nodes must be allocated from the nearest available node >>> to improve performance. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> include/linux/memblock.h | 1 + >>> mm/memblock.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+) >> >> Hi Will, >> It seems no one take care about this, how about I move below function into arch/arm64/mm/numa.c >> again? So that, merge it and patch 11 into one. > > I'd rather you reposted it after the merge window so we can see what to > do with it then. The previous posting was really hard to figure out and > mixed lots of different concepts into one series, so it's not completely > surprising that it didn't all get picked up. OK, thanks. > > Will > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
