On 08 October 2016 01:22, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/07/2016 04:35 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 06:01:23PM +0000, Steve Twiss wrote: > >> On 07 October 2016 18:02, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> > >>>> On 06 October 2016 19:49, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 04:28:14PM +0000, Steve Twiss wrote: > >>>>>> I am using the compatible string to pick a different configuration .data block: > >>>>>> { .compatible = "dlg,da9062-watchdog", .data = &da9062_watchdog_info }, > >>>>>> { .compatible = "dlg,da9061-watchdog", .data = &da9061_watchdog_info }, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> But, it is just my opinion to keep the "name" different. > >>>>>> This will not be my decision if accepted into the Linux kernel, but I would like to > >>>>>> at least be consistent for DA9061 and DA9062 so ... is this an issue? > >>>>> > >>>>> FWIW the driver doesn't really need to be updated in the first place. > >>>>> A compatible statement listing both da9061 and da9062 would do it. > >>>> > >>>> I will make the changes you requested: deprecate the existing compatibility > >>>> for da9062-watchdog and make a new compatibility string which combines both > >>>> da9061 and da9062. > >>>> > >>> That is not what I asked for. > >> > >> Ok. Did you mean separate compatible statements with data sections pointing at > >> the same structure? > >> > >> Like this: > >> { .compatible = "dlg,da9062-watchdog", .data = &da9062_watchdog_info }, > >> { .compatible = "dlg,da9061-watchdog", .data = &da9062_watchdog_info }, > >> > >> So this would be the only change needed in the device driver. > > > > If there is no change in IP block then I do not see why we need to > > introduce new names at all. The dts can specify fallback compatible > > stting. Note, it is called *compatible* not "model" or "device id" or > > whatever. So you can just say in DTS: > > > > compatible = "dlg,da9061-watchdog", "dlg,da9062-watchdog"; > > > > and leave the driver alone. That goes for input part as well. You only > > need to add new compatible to the driver when it in fact is > > *incompatible* with the existing blocks. > > > Yes, exactly. Dmitry, Guenter, Thanks for putting things straight on this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html