On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:32:12AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The generic pin configuration and multiplexing should be preferred now, > > even though we still support the old one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > index 69617220c5d6..e8b7cf64fdf1 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt > > @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ pins it needs, and how they should be configured, with regard to muxer > > configuration, drive strength and pullups. If one of these options is > > not set, its actual value will be unspecified. > > > > +This driver supports the generic pin multiplexing and configuration > > +bindings. > > Should we list which options are supported? We don't support them all. Yep, I'll add that. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
