On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 01:55:02AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Stephen Boyd (2016-09-13 18:42:46) > > On the db410c 96boards platform we have a TC7USB40MU[1] on the > > board to mux the D+/D- lines from the SoC between a micro usb > > "device" port and a USB hub for "host" roles. Upon a role switch, > > we need to change this mux to forward the D+/D- lines to either > > the port or the hub. Therefore, introduce a driver for this > > device that intercepts extcon USB_HOST events and logically > > asserts a gpio to mux the "host" D+/D- lines when a host cable is > > attached. When the cable goes away, it will logically deassert > > the gpio and mux the "device" lines. > > > > [1] https://toshiba.semicon-storage.com/ap-en/product/logic/bus-switch/detail.TC7USB40MU.html > > > > Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Should I make the extcon part optional? I could see a case where there are two > > "OTG" ports connected to the mux (or two hubs), and for some reason the > > software may want to mux between them at runtime. If we mandate an extcon, > > that won't be possible to support. Perhaps it would be better to have > > the node, but connect it to the usb controller with a phandle (maybe of_graph > > endpoints would be useful too) so that when the controller wants to mux over > > a port it can do so. I've mentioned my opinion on extcon before. The first clue that it needs work is a Linux subsystem name is used for the binding. > Here's some dts mock-up on top of the db410c for the of_graph stuff. I > haven't written any code around it, but the idea is to allow the binding > to specify how the mux is connected to upstream and downstream D+/D- > lines. This way, we can do some dt parsing of the endpoints and their > parent nodes to figure out if the mux needs to be set high or low to use > a device connector or a usb hub based on if the id cable is present. > Maybe I'm over thinking things though and we could just have a DT > property for that. I think the connector nodes are on the right track, but of-graph doesn't work here because we already have a way to describe USB buses in DT. Following that, would something like this work for you? The vbus-supply and id-gpios are just examples and may not always be there like if the hub controls each port's vbus directly. usb-controller@1234 { usb-switch@0 { compatible = "toshiba,tc7usb40mu"; hub@0 { compatible = "some-hub"; port@0 { compatible = "usb-A-connector" vbus-supply = ...; }; port@1 { compatible = "usb-A-connector" vbus-supply = ...; }; }; connector@1 { compatible = "usb-ub-connector"; vbus-supply = ...; id-gpios = <>; }; }; }; Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
