Hi Brendan, On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:35 AM, Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > First off, someone pointed out to me that the mapping that I used between > addresses and bus numbers is not actually valid for busses 8-14. > > This could be fixed by checking the offset, but I am wondering if that is > the right way to do it. It seems like this is not completely trivial so > maybe this should be specified in the device tree? If that is the case, > should I do this as another reg entry or go back to the way I was doing it > before? I don't see an alternative way to derive these numbers. As you mention, the block of SRAM in the middle of the IP screwing up the linear mapping. I suggest going back to what you have in v2, with a mention in the commit message as to why the bus property is necessary. Cheers, Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
