On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > Thomas, > > On 09/20/2016 11:51 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > > > > On 09/14/2016 03:34 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > Well, you just used some function in some context which is not > > > > > relevant to > > > > > the normal operation. So adding that mask() is just paranoia for no > > > > > value. > > > > > > > A gentle reminder ping... > > > If ".free" callback is not relevant then I 'll remove it from exti domain. > > Sorry for discussing about the same thing again (and again) but I just want to > be sure before sending a new version. As you know I have 2 domains: EXTI > domain (parent) and stm32-pinctrl-bank domain (child one). > > There does it make sens to have ".free" callbacks defined in both domain > (actually if I define one for the child domain I have to define also ".free" > callback for parent domain (EXTI) as it is hierarchical) ? > If ".free" have no chance to be called then I will send a new version by > removing .free callbacks (in both domain). Free will be called when a interrupt in the child domain is torn down, i.e. when irq_domain_free_irqs() is called. And it will be called for both domains like the alloc callback is invoked on both domains via irq_domain_alloc_irqs(). Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
