On Friday 16 September 2016 07:01 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 05:12:38PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
Should i repost this series? I do not see this series in linux-next yet.
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
I should have been clearer.
The last Lee Jones conveyed that:
"I can't take this series yet, since it relies on a change which was
taken into Mark's Regulator tree"
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/31/312
So wanted to check if i needed to re-base/repost this series again.
Sorry about the confusion i think that is because of $Subject goof up in
the 0th patch of the series.
Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in
doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
