On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 04:55:59PM +0200, Sebastian Frias wrote: > On 09/13/2016 03:12 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >> Exactly, that is why I was thinking it would take less "review" time. > >> Indeed, if there is no driver, why would it matter what those bindings > >> are? > > > > If you believe that the bindings don't matter, then there is absolutely > > no reason for them to exist in the first place. > > > > If those binding matter to *anyone*, then those collating the bindings > > have some responsibility of stewardship, and that includes > > review/maintenance/etc. > > The thing is that right now it seems the "responsibility of stewardship" > lies only within "Linux", whereas DT is proposed as open for everybody, > Bootloaders, FreeBSD, etc. > > In that case, shouldn't the "responsibility" be shared? Ideally, yes. Which is one of the reasons devicetree.org was set up as a common forum for projects to collaborate on devicetree. Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
