Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes: > On 09/07/2016 01:55 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes: > > [...] full mail thread in https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/6/747 > >>> Overall architecture is very similar to SCPI[4] as follows: >> >> Dumb Q: I'm curious about the limitations in SCPI that were found that >> made TI decided to implement its own version. [...] > Long story short, investigation was done into what SCPI was providing > (TI internal ofcourse) and SCPI did not fit our SoC generation needs - Thanks for the detailed explanation. Very helpful. To be clear, I'm not a proponent of always using ARM "standards" (especially when it's not exactly clear if it's a standard or a Juno thing) but I'm seeing several SoCs come out with SCPI derivatives, or old ARM versions etc., so was just curious about the decision making process. Thanks for sharing, Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
