On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:23:31AM -0700, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2016-09-06 01:21, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > In order to ease transitions with drivers are boards start using regulators > > provide an option to cause all regulator_get() calls to succeed, with a > > dummy always on regulator being supplied where one has not been configured. > > A warning is printed whenever the dummy regulator is used to aid system > > development. > I think we should either make the property mandatory and fix the device > trees or we should fix the driver to support an optional regulator. The > code already supports the reg_lcd being NULL, which is probably mostly > pointless right now as devm_regulator_get always returns a dummy > regulator. I think you're agreeing with each other here (and me).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
