On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Jun Nie <jun.nie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Some pin functions may be controlled in 2nd level multiplex. > We need configure 1st level multiplex when request such > functions. Export pin_request functionality so that parent > can be configured automatically with calling it in > pinmux_ops->request(). > > Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@xxxxxxxxxx> This looks weird as 1/3, please put the DT bindings first in the series. We first need to agree on how to represent this before we start hacking around in the core to support different shortcuts. This patch just makes me nervous, but maybe I can be convinced otherwise if we get some details on how the hardware works and why this is necessary. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
