Hi Thomas,
On 09/02/2016 08:57 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Alexandre,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
This all looks very reasonable. The only complaint I have is your variable
declaration ordering or the lack thereof.
1)
+ struct irq_domain *domain = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
+ struct irq_chip_generic *gc = domain->gc->gc[0];
+ struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
+ unsigned long pending;
+ int n;
2)
+ struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ u32 rtsr, ftsr;
+ int pin = data->hwirq;
3)
+ struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ int pin = data->hwirq;
+ u32 emr;
4)
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
+ struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
+ struct irq_chip_generic *gc = d->gc->gc[0];
5)
+ int nr_irqs, nr_exti, ret, i;
+ unsigned int clr = IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN;
+ struct irq_domain *domain;
+ struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
+ void *base;
#1 and 3 have the ordering which is preferred in the irq code.
#2, #4 and #5 are three permutations which are way harder to read.
+ struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ int pin = data->hwirq;
+ u32 rtsr, ftsr;
+ struct irq_chip_generic *gc = d->gc->gc[0];
+ struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
+ unsigned int clr = IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN;
+ int nr_irqs, nr_exti, ret, i;
+ struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
+ struct irq_domain *domain;
+ void *base;
Can you spot the difference?
Thanks for review and for proposal. It Will be in next version.
Regards
Alex
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
