On 09/01/2016 01:20 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi Milo, On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:25:17PM +0900, Milo Kim wrote:H3 PA5 pin is assigned for single PWM channel. Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@xxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi index fdf9fdb..05d0c4b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi @@ -360,6 +360,13 @@ allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>; }; + pwm0_pin_a: pwm0@0 { + allwinner,pins = "PA5"; + allwinner,function = "pwm0"; + allwinner,drive = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_10_MA>; + allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>; + }; +Is it used on any boards? If not, we have the policy of not merging the pinctrl nodes that are not used by anyone to avoid bloating the DT for no particular reason.
Yes, I have. It's Nano Pi M1 which was derived from Orange Pi PC. The board DTS is ready to be sent out, but I'm not sure which is better. a) Send new board DTS file in other patch thread [PATCH v3 0/4] Add PWM feature in Allwinner H3 [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PWM pin in H3 .. [PATCH v3 4/4] pwm: sunxi: Add H3 support [PATCH] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add Nano Pi M1 support Or b) Include the DTS in next patch-set v3 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add PWM feature in Allwinner H3 [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PWM pin in H3 [PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PWM controller node in H3 [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add Nano Pi M1 support ... I'd like to have your opinion. Best regards, Milo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
