On Thursday, September 1, 2016 1:12:18 PM CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > Shouldn't macros that are also used by s3c* be named as > > SAMSUNG_PIN_FUNC_2 etc. (s3c* SoCs are not Exynos)? > > Right, this is the inconsistency. The problem with "samsung" prefix is > that there is no guarantee it will be like that for newer SoCs. How > about one of: > 1. using the oldest prefix (S3C24XX in this case), > 2. duplicating them per SoC family (so S3C24XX, S3C64XX, EXYNOS). > ? I'd suggest living with the inconsistency and using EXYNOS as the prefix, as that is the most common one these days, even if the other ones predate it. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
