On 2016/8/26 20:54, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:44:47PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >> From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Use pr_fmt to prefix kernel output, and remove duplicated msg >> of NUMA turned off. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c >> index d97c6e2..7b73808 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c >> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ >> * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. >> */ >> >> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "numa: " fmt > > Shouldn't this be uppercase for consistency with the existing code and > the code in places like drivers/of/of_numa.c? OK, I will change it to "NUMA: ". > >> #include <linux/acpi.h> >> #include <linux/bootmem.h> >> #include <linux/memblock.h> >> @@ -38,10 +40,9 @@ static __init int numa_parse_early_param(char *opt) >> { >> if (!opt) >> return -EINVAL; >> - if (!strncmp(opt, "off", 3)) { >> - pr_info("%s\n", "NUMA turned off"); >> + if (!strncmp(opt, "off", 3)) >> numa_off = true; >> - } >> + >> return 0; >> } >> early_param("numa", numa_parse_early_param); >> @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ static void __init setup_node_to_cpumask_map(void) >> set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, NUMA_NO_NODE); >> >> /* cpumask_of_node() will now work */ >> - pr_debug("NUMA: Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids); >> + pr_debug("Node to cpumask map for %d nodes\n", nr_node_ids); >> } >> >> /* >> @@ -145,13 +146,13 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end) >> >> ret = memblock_set_node(start, (end - start), &memblock.memory, nid); >> if (ret < 0) { >> - pr_err("NUMA: memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n", >> + pr_err("memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n", >> start, (end - 1), nid); >> return ret; >> } >> >> node_set(nid, numa_nodes_parsed); >> - pr_info("NUMA: Adding memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] on node %d\n", >> + pr_info("Adding memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] on node %d\n", >> start, (end - 1), nid); >> return ret; >> } >> @@ -166,19 +167,18 @@ static void __init setup_node_data(int nid, u64 start_pfn, u64 end_pfn) >> void *nd; >> int tnid; >> >> - pr_info("NUMA: Initmem setup node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n", >> - nid, start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, >> - (end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1); >> + pr_info("Initmem setup node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n", >> + nid, start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, (end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1); >> >> nd_pa = memblock_alloc_try_nid(nd_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid); >> nd = __va(nd_pa); >> >> /* report and initialize */ >> - pr_info("NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n", >> + pr_info(" NODE_DATA [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n", > > Why are you adding leading whitespace? Kefeng Wang said that just in order to make the final print info looks more clear. I will remove the leading whitespace in v8. > >> nd_pa, nd_pa + nd_size - 1); >> tnid = early_pfn_to_nid(nd_pa >> PAGE_SHIFT); >> if (tnid != nid) >> - pr_info("NUMA: NODE_DATA(%d) on node %d\n", nid, tnid); >> + pr_info(" NODE_DATA(%d) on node %d\n", nid, tnid); > > > Same here. > >> node_data[nid] = nd; >> memset(NODE_DATA(nid), 0, sizeof(pg_data_t)); >> @@ -235,8 +235,7 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void) >> numa_distance[i * numa_distance_cnt + j] = i == j ? >> LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE; >> >> - pr_debug("NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", >> - numa_distance_cnt); >> + pr_debug("Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", numa_distance_cnt); >> >> return 0; >> } >> @@ -257,20 +256,20 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void) >> void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance) >> { >> if (!numa_distance) { >> - pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: distance table not allocated yet\n"); >> + pr_warn_once("Warning: distance table not allocated yet\n"); >> return; >> } >> >> if (from >= numa_distance_cnt || to >= numa_distance_cnt || >> from < 0 || to < 0) { >> - pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n", >> + pr_warn_once("Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n", >> from, to, distance); >> return; >> } >> >> if ((u8)distance != distance || >> (from == to && distance != LOCAL_DISTANCE)) { >> - pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: invalid distance parameter, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n", >> + pr_warn_once("Warning: invalid distance parameter, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n", >> from, to, distance); >> return; >> } >> @@ -297,7 +296,7 @@ static int __init numa_register_nodes(void) >> /* Check that valid nid is set to memblks */ >> for_each_memblock(memory, mblk) >> if (mblk->nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || mblk->nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) { >> - pr_warn("NUMA: Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n", >> + pr_warn("Warning: invalid memblk node %d [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]\n", >> mblk->nid, mblk->base, >> mblk->base + mblk->size - 1); >> return -EINVAL; >> @@ -368,9 +367,10 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void) >> struct memblock_region *mblk; >> >> if (numa_off) >> - pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */ >> - pr_info("NUMA: Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", >> - 0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1); >> + pr_warn("NUMA turned off by user\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */ > > Why are you changing the string? What's wrong with "NUMA turned off" like > we had before? OK. I will keep it no change in v8. > > Will > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
