On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 15:57 +0530, Bhaskar Upadhaya wrote: > Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Upadhaya <Bhaskar.Upadhaya@xxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt > index a7440bc..e9f923d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ elan Elan Microelectronic Corp. > embest Shenzhen Embest Technology Co., Ltd. > emmicro EM Microelectronic > energymicro Silicon Laboratories (formerly Energy Micro AS) > +eon Eon Silicon Solution, Inc. > epcos EPCOS AG > epfl Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne > epson Seiko Epson Corp. > @@ -246,6 +247,7 @@ solomon Solomon Systech Limited > sony Sony Corporation > spansion Spansion Inc. > sprd Spreadtrum Communications Inc. > +sst Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. > st STMicroelectronics > startek Startek > ste ST-Ericsson What does LS1012A have to do with these vendors? At most your motivation might be that these chips are on a board that happens to also have an LS1012A on it, but that doesn't make it an appropriate patch description. Better would be something like "dt-bindings: Add eon and sst vendor strings" with the changelog body mentioning that you're documenting prefixes that are already in use. -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
