numa_init(of_numa_init) may returned error because of numa configuration
error. So "No NUMA configuration found" is inaccurate. In fact, specific
configuration error information should be immediately printed by the
testing branch.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
index 5bb15ea..d97c6e2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
@@ -335,8 +335,10 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- if (nodes_empty(numa_nodes_parsed))
+ if (nodes_empty(numa_nodes_parsed)) {
+ pr_info("No NUMA configuration found\n");
return -EINVAL;
+ }
ret = numa_register_nodes();
if (ret < 0)
@@ -367,8 +369,6 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
if (numa_off)
pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */
- else
- pr_info("No NUMA configuration found\n");
pr_info("NUMA: Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
0LLU, PFN_PHYS(max_pfn) - 1);
--
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
