On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:58:07PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quoting Peter Chen (2016-07-08 02:04:58) > >> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:20:54PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> > @@ -39,6 +42,10 @@ static int ulpi_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *driver) > >> > struct ulpi *ulpi = to_ulpi_dev(dev); > >> > const struct ulpi_device_id *id; > >> > > >> > + /* Some ULPI devices don't have a product id so rely on OF match */ > >> > + if (ulpi->id.product == 0) > >> > + return of_driver_match_device(dev, driver); > >> > + > >> > >> How about using vendor id? It can't be 0, but pid may be 0. > >> See: http://www.linux-usb.org/usb.ids > > > > Heikki suggested a product id of 0 would mean we need to use DT > > matching. Should it be changed to vendor id instead? > > Any comments here? It makes sense. I don't have any problem with that. Thanks, -- heikki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
