On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:35:08AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to > > be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where > > we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to > > describe them as devices. > > This is out of date now. Otherwise, the binding looks fine. Yes, you are right. Perhaps if this is okay with Thierry, he can remove these few lines. If not, I don't mind re-sending on request. I'll leave it until I hear otherwise. > > The second documentation adaption entails adding support for PWM > > capture devices. A new clock is required as well as an IRQ line. > > We're also adding a new property similar to the one described > > above, but for capture channels. Typically, there will be less > > capture channels than PWM-out, since all channels have the latter > > capability, but only some have capture support. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-st.txt | 8 +++++--- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
