On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <ccc94453@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 07:56:24AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: >> > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> > index 1992aa9..fbad2cea 100644 >> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt >> > @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ ste ST-Ericsson >> > stericsson ST-Ericsson >> > syna Synaptics Inc. >> > synology Synology, Inc. >> > +sunchip Shenzhen Sunchip Technology Co., Ltd >> > SUNW Sun Microsystems, Inc >> >> These are not in alphabetical order. Maybe someone thought uppercase >> should be separate, but I don't. So please fix the ordering here moving >> SUNW before syna. > > I'm new to this, so I could use a bit of guidance here. Is it OK if I > send a follow-up patch to fix the ordering or should I send a patch to > fix the ordering first, before the sunchip prefix is added? For this, just doing it all in one patch is fine. If you want to do 2 patches, then fix SUNW first then add sunchip. > I never considered the possibility that the list wouldn't be in > alphabetical order to begin with, so the brain power went into deciding > if uppercase should be sorted separately. Even if uppercase is sorted after lowercase, you've got it in the wrong place. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
