On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 07:00:20AM +0000, Karl Beldan wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:15:15PM +0000, Karl Beldan wrote: > > Many davinci boards (da830 and da850 families) don't have their clocks > > in DT yet and won't be successful in getting an unnamed aemif clock. > > Also the sole current users of ti-aemif (keystone boards) use 'aemif' as > > their aemif device clock clock-name and should remain unaffected. > > > > Signed-off-by: Karl Beldan <kbeldan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c b/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c > > index a579a0f..c251fc8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c > > +++ b/drivers/memory/ti-aemif.c > > @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int aemif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, aemif); > > > > - aemif->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL); > > + aemif->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "aemif"); > > Looking further it seems to me that the struct clk_lookup da850_clks > registered by davinci_clk_init() should be enough to clk_get() unnamed > clocks using only the dev name. I look into what's going on but it > would make this patch unnecessary. > Ok, just saw what's happening, this patch is unnecessary, v2 will follow. Karl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
