On Tuesday 26 November 2013 06:50 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 06:35:35PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
On Tuesday 26 November 2013 06:31 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
Is this really generic enough to put here rather than in the driver
data?
The thought behind this was that if a master controller supports
memory mapped operation and slave wants to use memcpy in his
driver(bypassing spi ), then we should have a mean to communicate
between the
master and the slave. So, 'spi_master' seems to be the place for me
for this data,
which could be parsed in the slave side also.
I would have expected that the address would be returned by the function
that maps the buffer in rather than stored permanently in the master.
Yes, it could be be done the above way. I will change.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
