Karl Beldan <kbeldan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 12:15:05PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> + Sekhar >> >> Hi Karl, >> >> Karl Beldan <kbeldan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > The LCDK is the successor to the late Hawkboard and has the same machine >> > number. >> >> Machine number is only relevant for legacy (non-DT) boot and this is DT >> boot, so the machine number bit really relevant for this changelog. >> > Hi Kevin, > > It was purely informative. > >> BTW, have you tried legacy boot on LCDK with board-omapl138-hawk.c? I >> assume it mostly works? >> > Yes. > >> > Among the differences are the flash (16bits vs 8bits) and some pins >> > (MMC, LEDs, buttons, some external connectors), however the main >> > components remain the same (eth. PHY, Audio Codec, Video decoder and >> > DAC) except for the main PMIC, different and hard-wired on the LCDK (the >> > LDOs and DCDCs are always ON). >> > A DT-only boot with this addition gives functional uart, reboot via >> > watchdog, rtc, ethernet and MMC (I added the CD gpio for the MMC >> > although davinci_mmc doesn't call yet the mmc core OF facilities). >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Karl Beldan <kbeldan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Tested with v4.7 on my LCDK board. >> >> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Note that I also needed CONFIG_RTC_DRV_OMAP=m enabled in >> davinci_all_defconfig for the RTC driver. Could you add a patch for that >> to this series as well? >> > No problem. BTW do you also consider CONFIG_ items not arch specific > (like CONFIG_NET_VENDOR_SMSC) ? Do you mean for davinci_all_config? Yes. > >> Also, plese Cc the co-maintainer Sekhar Nori (now Cc'd) on all future >> davinci patches. >> > Sure. > >> > --- >> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci.txt | 4 ++ >> > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + >> > arch/arm/boot/dts/omapl138-lcdk.dts | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> I think this should be called da850-lcdk.dts. >> >> The OMAP prefix in the DT directory is just going to cause confusion, >> and the other DTs using this same SoC are already called da850. >> > That's what I thought too, mainline U-Boot is using omapl138_lcdk but > yes da850 is less confusing given the code already present (downside is > when you search for da850 on the net there's nothing). OK, let's stick with da850 for the DT names. The other help texts already list all the names da850/omapl138/am18x so we should be fine. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
