Hi,
On 30-07-16 13:35, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
30.07.2016, 18:30, "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi,
On 30-07-16 11:36, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
A64 SoC features a MMC controller which need only the mod clock, and can
calibrate delay by itself. This patch adds support for the new MMC
controller IP core.
Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxxx>
Cool stuff, thanks for your work on this!
---
drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 122 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
index 2ee4c21..ac56bcf 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
@@ -72,6 +72,14 @@
#define SDXC_REG_CHDA (0x90)
#define SDXC_REG_CBDA (0x94)
+/* New registers introduced in A64 */
+#define SDXC_REG_A12A 0x058 /* SMC Auto Command 12 Register */
+#define SDXC_REG_SD_NTSR 0x05C /* SMC New Timing Set Register */
+#define SDXC_REG_DRV_DL 0x140 /* Drive Delay Control Register */
+#define SDXC_REG_SAMP_DL_REG 0x144 /* SMC sample delay control */
+#define SDXC_REG_DS_DL_REG 0x148 /* SMC data strobe delay control */
+
+
#define mmc_readl(host, reg) \
readl((host)->reg_base + SDXC_##reg)
#define mmc_writel(host, reg, value) \
@@ -217,6 +225,15 @@
#define SDXC_CLK_50M_DDR 3
#define SDXC_CLK_50M_DDR_8BIT 4
+#define SDXC_2X_TIMING_MODE BIT(31)
+
+#define SDXC_CAL_START BIT(15)
+#define SDXC_CAL_DONE BIT(14)
+#define SDXC_CAL_DL_SHIFT 8
+#define SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN BIT(7)
+#define SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT 0
+#define SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK 0x3f
+
struct sunxi_mmc_clk_delay {
u32 output;
u32 sample;
@@ -261,6 +278,9 @@ struct sunxi_mmc_host {
/* vqmmc */
bool vqmmc_enabled;
+
+ /* does the IP block support autocalibration? */
+ bool can_calibrate;
};
static int sunxi_mmc_reset_host(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host)
@@ -653,10 +673,66 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
return 0;
}
+static int sunxi_mmc_calibrate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host,
+ struct mmc_ios *ios, int reg_off)
+{
+ u32 reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off);
+ u32 delay;
+
+ reg &= ~(SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT);
+ reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
+
+ writel(reg | SDXC_CAL_START, host->reg_base + reg_off);
+
+ dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration started\n");
+
+ while (!((reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off)) & SDXC_CAL_DONE))
+ cpu_relax();
+
+ delay = (reg >> SDXC_CAL_DL_SHIFT) & SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK;
+
+ reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
+ reg |= (delay << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT) | SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
+
+ writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
+
+ dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration ended, res is 0x%x\n", reg);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int sunxi_mmc_determine_delays(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host,
+ struct mmc_ios *ios, int rate)
+{
+ int index;
+
+ if (rate <= 400000) {
+ index = SDXC_CLK_400K;
+ } else if (rate <= 25000000) {
+ index = SDXC_CLK_25M;
+ } else if (rate <= 52000000) {
+ if (ios->timing != MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50 &&
+ ios->timing != MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52) {
+ index = SDXC_CLK_50M;
+ } else if (ios->bus_width == MMC_BUS_WIDTH_8) {
+ index = SDXC_CLK_50M_DDR_8BIT;
+ } else {
+ index = SDXC_CLK_50M_DDR;
+ }
+ } else {
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ clk_set_phase(host->clk_sample, host->clk_delays[index].sample);
+ clk_set_phase(host->clk_output, host->clk_delays[index].output);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
The factoring out of this into a function really should be done in
a separate preparation patch, that will also make the patch making
the actual functional changes much easier to read.
Thanks.
And I forgot add the infomation that the patch is based on apritzel's
work...
I will soon send a PATCH v2.
If your A10/13 mmc clock driver can be merged ASAP, then I will be
able to drop some bits from the patch.
Ok, I'm working on v2 now, and it looks like factoring out the
clk_delay / phase stuff is useful for my v2 too, so I'm going to
do a patch factoring this out myself. I'll send my v2 in 1 - 2
hours from now, you may want to base your v2 on my work (it contains
some other refactoring which should make things easier too).
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
