On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 11:14:20AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:57:32PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > This device seems to be used on x86 systems so we'll need to ensure that > > they register clocks for this. They really should set this up using > > quirks keyed off DMI information or similar so it's hidden from other > > systems. > Hmm..the change defines this mclk as a optional property so I'm > not sure how it would affect x86 systems. (Would love to refine Ah, clk_prepare_enable() silently ignores NULL as an argument? It is a bit messy to do things that way but might be the most practical thing. > it to make it impactless.) Since it's literally hidden, any way > that I can manually ensure it? Or just wait for an ack from x86 > developers? Hopefully they'll speak up - we're in the merge window anyway so it'll be just over a week before this can go into -next.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
