Hi Rob, On lun., juil. 25 2016, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:12:43 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> Yes, I get that, but that is only meaningful if you want to run an OS >> that is only aware of 395 on a 398 SoC/board (though I'd guess the 390 >> compat is enough for that). Otherwise, that property is not really >> meaningful as the additional nodes are enough to handle what is the >> superset. >> >> I would agree both are fine if both chips are in fact the same die, >> just fused or packaged differently. I've seen a lot of chips that are >> supposed to be sub/supersets of each other, but have different errata >> lists because they are different die. > > Unfortunately HW vendors are rarely willing to publicly indicate whether > the different chips in their families are actually the same die fused > differently, or really different dies. So do you want that we keep both "marvell,armada398" and "marvell,armada395" or do you xant we use only "marvell,armada398" ? Thanks, Gregory > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > http://free-electrons.com -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
