> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Rutland [mailto:mark.rutland@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 7:15 PM > To: Lu Jingchang-B35083 > Cc: vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wang Huan-B18965; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] dma: Add Freescale eDMA engine driver support > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 07:43:04AM +0000, Jingchang Lu wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Mark Rutland [mailto:mark.rutland@xxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:46 PM > > > To: Lu Jingchang-B35083 > > > Cc: vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wang Huan- > B18965; > > > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- > > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] dma: Add Freescale eDMA engine driver > support > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:57:59AM +0100, Jingchang Lu wrote: > > > > Add Freescale enhanced direct memory(eDMA) controller support. > > > > The eDMA controller deploys DMAMUXs routing DMA request > sources(slot) > > > > to eDMA channels. > > > > This module can be found on Vybrid and LS-1 SoCs. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alison Wang <b18965@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jingchang Lu <b35083@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [...] > > > > +* DMAMUX > > > > +Required properties: > > > > > > No compatible? > > > > > > Where are DMAMUX nodes expected to live? > > > > > > How to they relate to the eDMA controller in HW? Are they a > > > subcomponent, or a logically separate unit that happens to be > connected? > > [Lu Jingchang-b35083] > > DMAMUX is a multiplexer between dma controller channels and peripheral > deivces, > > each DMAMUX provides 16 independently selectable DMA channel routers, > and each > > channel router can be assigned to one of the possible peripheral DMA > slots. > > So it's not a standalone device, it's just required by the DMA > controller to > > connect the channels and slaves, So it's got by DMA controller's > "fsl,dma-mux" property. > > Thanks! > > Ok. > > I'm not so sure on the way this is described, from the point of view of > the device, its DMA channel is wired to the MUX, not to the DMA engine > directly: > > +-------+ > /---------|DEVICE0| > | +-------+ > +-----+ +------+ > | DMA |===|DMAMUX| > +-----+ +------+ > | +-------+ > \---------|DEVICE1| > +-------+ > > If that's the case, I'd expect the DMAMUX to have a #dma-cells and > describe each device as being wired to the mux, and then the mux as > being wired to the DMA. If the MUXes are sub-blocks of the DMA, then I'm > not sure why they need to be described at all. > > Currently, the DMA code is handling information that's specific to the > MUX (i.e. the channel ID that's specific to the MUX), and that feels odd > unless the MUX is a component of the DMA (which if true I'd expect it to > be described differently). > Yes, the connection is as your imagination, except for each DMA has two MUX. The DMA helper looks the registered DMA engineer for DMA channel binding, and the registered DMA engineer is the eDMA node, if binding to DMAMUX, the helper will not find out the dma engineer. The only DMAMUX configuration is programming the slave id into its corresponding register, so its code is handled by the eDMA driver, the DMAMUX is not optional. Thanks! Best Regards, Jingchang ��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
