On 24/07/16 17:08, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> This adds Texas Instruments' ADC12130/ADC12132/ADC12138 12-bit plus
> sign ADC driver. I have tested with the ADC12138. The ADC12130 and
> ADC12132 are not tested but these are similar to ADC12138 except that
> the mode programming instruction is a bit different.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Akinobu,
I'm out of time this evening and it may be a while before I get
a chance to look at this again. So one quick comment in case you
respin in the meantime.
Otherwise from a quick read through looks good - but I'll want to
take a closer look before applying it.
Jonathan
...
> +static int adc12138_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> + struct adc12138 *adc;
> + int ret;
> +
> + indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*adc));
> + if (!indio_dev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + adc = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + adc->spi = spi;
> + adc->id = spi_get_device_id(spi)->driver_data;
> + mutex_init(&adc->lock);
> + init_completion(&adc->complete);
> +
> + indio_dev->name = spi_get_device_id(spi)->name;
> + indio_dev->dev.parent = &spi->dev;
> + indio_dev->info = &adc12138_info;
> + indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> +
> + switch (adc->id) {
> + case adc12130:
> + case adc12132:
> + indio_dev->channels = adc12132_channels;
> + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(adc12132_channels);
> + break;
> + case adc12138:
> + indio_dev->channels = adc12138_channels;
> + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(adc12138_channels);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(spi->dev.of_node, "acquisition-time",
> + &adc->acquisition_time);
> + if (ret)
> + adc->acquisition_time = 10;
> +
> + adc->cclk = devm_clk_get(&spi->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(adc->cclk))
> + return PTR_ERR(adc->cclk);
> +
> + adc->vref_p = devm_regulator_get(&spi->dev, "vref-p");
> + if (IS_ERR(adc->vref_p))
> + return PTR_ERR(adc->vref_p);
> +
> + adc->vref_n = devm_regulator_get_optional(&spi->dev, "vref-n");
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&spi->dev, spi->irq, adc12138_eoc_handler,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, indio_dev->name, indio_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(adc->cclk);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable(adc->vref_p);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error1;
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(adc->vref_n)) {
> + ret = regulator_enable(adc->vref_n);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error2;
> + }
> +
> + ret = adc12138_init(adc);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error3;
> +
> + spi_set_drvdata(spi, indio_dev);
> +
> + ret = iio_triggered_buffer_setup(indio_dev, NULL,
> + adc12138_trigger_handler, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error3;
> +
> + ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto error4;
> +
> + return 0;
> +error4:
I'm rather more in favour of error labels that tell you
what needs unwinding as they result in a lot less churn
an extra entry is needed in futre.
> + iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev);
> +error3:
> + if (!IS_ERR(adc->vref_n))
> + regulator_disable(adc->vref_n);
> +error2:
> + regulator_disable(adc->vref_p);
> +error1:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(adc->cclk);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
