On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:09:37AM +0530, Sinan Kaya wrote: > @@ -567,6 +578,98 @@ static int hidma_create_sysfs_entry(struct hidma_dev *dev, char *name, > return device_create_file(dev->ddev.dev, attrs); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN This can be true on machine with your older HW, so I would be bit more careful here.. > + if (rc) > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, > + "failed to request MSI irq, falling back to wired IRQ\n"); > + return rc; > +#else > + return -EINVAL; -EINVAL doesnt sound apt here.. > + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev); > + const char *of_compat; > + int ret; > + > + if (!adev || acpi_disabled) { > + ret = device_property_read_string(dev, "compatible", > + &of_compat); > + if (ret) > + return false; > + > + ret = strcmp(of_compat, "qcom,hidma-1.1"); > + } else { > + ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8062"); Okay if you ahve a device ID then why do we need new binding? This device as you said implies the support for MSI interrupts. Thanks -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html