Hi Guodong, >>> Two LED triggers are defined: tx_led and rx_led. Upon frames >>> available in HCI core layer, for tx or for rx, the combined LED >>> can blink. >>> >>> Verified on HiKey, 96boards. It uses hi6220 SoC and TI WL1835 combo >>> chip. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 1 + >>> net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 3 +++ >>> net/bluetooth/leds.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ >>> net/bluetooth/leds.h | 2 ++ >>> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h >>> index dc71473..37b8dd9 100644 >>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h >>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h >>> @@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ struct hci_dev { >>> bdaddr_t rpa; >>> >>> struct led_trigger *power_led; >>> + struct led_trigger *tx_led, *rx_led; >>> >>> int (*open)(struct hci_dev *hdev); >>> int (*close)(struct hci_dev *hdev); >>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c >>> index 45a9fc6..c6e1210 100644 >>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c >>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c >>> @@ -3248,6 +3248,7 @@ int hci_recv_frame(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) >>> skb_queue_tail(&hdev->rx_q, skb); >>> queue_work(hdev->workqueue, &hdev->rx_work); >>> >>> + hci_leds_blink_oneshot(hdev->rx_led); >>> return 0; >>> } >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(hci_recv_frame); >>> @@ -3325,6 +3326,8 @@ static void hci_send_frame(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) >>> BT_ERR("%s sending frame failed (%d)", hdev->name, err); >>> kfree_skb(skb); >>> } >>> + >>> + hci_leds_blink_oneshot(hdev->tx_led); >>> } >> >> so I am not convinced that this is the right way of doing TX/RX activity leds. This would have them purely based on HCI traffic and this would include control frames. >> > > Hi, Marcel > > + if (hci_skb_pkt_type(skb) == HCI_ACLDATA_PKT || > + hci_skb_pkt_type(skb) == HCI_SCODATA_PKT) > + hci_leds_blink_oneshot(hdev->rx_led); > + > > By adding pkt_type checks, we can limit LED blinks only at ACL/SCO > DATA_PKT. Similar checks can be added for tx_led too. > > Does this look good to you? If you agree, I can send v2 to include this change. we are not going to keep comparing packet types over and over again. The code is already doing that. So functions like hci_sched_acl and hci_acldata_packet are already present in the code. >> I think that we want activity leds for actual radio activity. Meaning that when we have an active connection and ACL packets are exchanged or when we are scanning. >> > > Radio is controlled in Bluetooth module side, not Host. So I'm afraid > actual radio activity cannot be captured in its exact form in Host > side. The purpose of this patch is not for radio, it is for > incoming/outgoing data. For example, it can give user a blinking > indicator on RX frames after a Bluetooth mouse is connected. Another > example, it can blink at bluetooth streamed audio (TX). So radio activity is caused by RX/TX meaning ACL/SCO packets for sure. There is also other radio activity caused by scanning, inquiry, create connection etc. And the question is if this should be there as well. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html