On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:02:51 +0200 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 11:47:18AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 05:43:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > Mark, do you want me to provide a stable branch with the PWM regulator > > > patches and resolve that conflict in your tree? Or would you rather take > > > the whole set based on a stable branch from the PWM tree? Or maybe yet > > > another possibility would be to base the PWM tree on a stable branch > > > from the regulator tree containing the above commit. > > > > Probably easiest to use this signed tag and resolve it in your tree: > > > > The following changes since commit 1a695a905c18548062509178b98bc91e67510864: > > > > Linux 4.7-rc1 (2016-05-29 09:29:24 -0700) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git tags/pwm-modernization > > > > for you to fetch changes up to c2588393e6315ab68207323d37d2a73713d6bc81: > > > > regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode (2016-07-07 11:45:06 +0200) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > regulator: Provide a branch for moderninzation of the PWM code > > > > There's a new, improved PWM API which allows a lot of improvements in > > the PWM regulator driver. Since the bulk of the changes are in the PWM > > API this is being managed in the PWM tree, merge pending regulator API > > changes to allow this to be resolved more easily. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Alexandre Courbot (1): > > regulator: pwm: Support for enable GPIO > > > > Boris Brezillon (1): > > regulator: pwm: Drop unneeded pwm_enable() call > > > > Douglas Anderson (1): > > regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode > > > > .../bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt | 7 +++- > > drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > Merged into for-4.8/regulator of the PWM tree and rebased Boris' > pwm-regulator patches on top. > > Boris, everything looks right to me, but can you take a quick look to > see if it all matches up with what you expect? It looks good, but I won't be able to test it on real hardware until next week. Heiko, Brian, can you try this pwm/for-4.8/regulator branch? Thanks, Boris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
