On 07/09/2016 11:23 AM, Randy Li wrote: > Those platforms are reported to use the same rtc IP core > as exynos3250's. Insufficient. Exynos4 also has to be updated. Actually all SoC from SoC family requires rtc src clock. I think S3C6410 also requires it but I don't have all the data necessary to confirm this. Best regards, Krzysztof > > Signed-off-by: Randy Li <ayaka@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi > index 62f3dcd..cdd69a0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi > @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ > }; > > rtc: rtc@10070000 { > - compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-rtc"; > + compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-rtc"; > reg = <0x10070000 0x100>; > interrupts = <0 73 0>, <0 74 0>; > interrupt-parent = <&pmu_system_controller>; > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi > index d5c0f18..71a1ad2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5.dtsi > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ > }; > > rtc: rtc@101E0000 { > - compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-rtc"; > + compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-rtc"; > reg = <0x101E0000 0x100>; > interrupts = <0 43 0>, <0 44 0>; > status = "disabled"; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html