On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:38:04PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:27:43AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 09:45:46PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:37:51PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > The armada-38x.dtsi has
> > > >
> > > > ref_clk0_pins: ref-clk-pins-0 {
> > > > marvell,pins = "mpp45";
> > > > marvell,function = "ref";
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > which you could reference rather then defining it yourself.
> > >
> > > Weren't these going to be deleted from the main SoC dtsi files,
> > > eventually? I thought that was the idea, to prevent cluttering
> > > up the .dtb files with nodes which aren't ever used.
> >
> > I've not heard they are going to be removed....
> >
> > Having work on mvebu, and a Freescale Vybrid board, i see two
> > different styles. mvebu defines all the common pinctrl values in the
> > .dtsi file, so making the .dts file pretty minimalist. For the vybrid
> > board there was nothing in the .dtsi file, the dts file is huge, and i
> > made at least one error, missing at required pin which took me a while
> > to debug.
> >
> > I would also say cluttered .dtb because of unused nodes it a compiler
> > issue. Why does it not optimise them out?
>
> How does it know that the pinmux nodes (which are nodes in their own
> right, just like any node specifying a real device) are "unused" ?
Yes, you are right. A phandle pointing to it shows it is used, but not
being references via a phandle does not mean it is unused.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
