Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal: Add Mediatek thermal driver for mt2701.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi Dawei Chien,


On Thursday 07 July 2016 02:36 PM, Dawei Chien wrote:
This patch adds support for mt2701 chip to mtk_thermal.c,
and integrate both mt8173 and mt2701 on the same driver.
MT8173 has four banks and five sensors, and MT2701 has
only one bank and three sensors.

Signed-off-by: Dawei Chien <dawei.chien@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c |  258 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
  1 file changed, 165 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
index 262ab0a..860f2e2 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/mtk_thermal.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
   * Copyright (c) 2015 MediaTek Inc.
   * Author: Hanyi Wu <hanyi.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   *         Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ *         Dawei Chien <dawei.chien@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   *
   * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
   * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
@@ -21,6 +22,7 @@
  #include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
  #include <linux/of.h>
  #include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
  #include <linux/slab.h>
  #include <linux/io.h>
@@ -88,6 +90,7 @@
  #define TEMP_ADCVALIDMASK_VALID_HIGH		BIT(5)
  #define TEMP_ADCVALIDMASK_VALID_POS(bit)	(bit)

+/* MT8173 thermal sensors */
  #define MT8173_TS1	0
  #define MT8173_TS2	1
  #define MT8173_TS3	2
@@ -97,35 +100,62 @@
  /* AUXADC channel 11 is used for the temperature sensors */
  #define MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL	11

-/* The total number of temperature sensors in the MT8173 */
-#define MT8173_NUM_SENSORS		5
-
-/* The number of banks in the MT8173 */
-#define MT8173_NUM_ZONES		4
-
-/* The number of sensing points per bank */
-#define MT8173_NUM_SENSORS_PER_ZONE	4
-
  /* Layout of the fuses providing the calibration data */
-#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VALID		BIT(0)
-#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF1_ADC_GE(x)	(((x) >> 22) & 0x3ff)
-#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS1(x)	(((x) >> 17) & 0x1ff)
-#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS2(x)	(((x) >> 8) & 0x1ff)
-#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF1_VTS_TS3(x)	(((x) >> 0) & 0x1ff)
-#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS4(x)	(((x) >> 23) & 0x1ff)
-#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TSABB(x)	(((x) >> 14) & 0x1ff)
-#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_DEGC_CALI(x)	(((x) >> 1) & 0x3f)
-#define MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_O_SLOPE(x)	(((x) >> 26) & 0x3f)
+#define CALIB_BUF0_VALID		BIT(0)
+#define CALIB_BUF1_ADC_GE(x)	(((x) >> 22) & 0x3ff)
+#define CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS1(x)	(((x) >> 17) & 0x1ff)
+#define CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS2(x)	(((x) >> 8) & 0x1ff)
+#define CALIB_BUF1_VTS_TS3(x)	(((x) >> 0) & 0x1ff)
+#define CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS4(x)	(((x) >> 23) & 0x1ff)
+#define CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS5(x)	(((x) >> 14) & 0x1ff)
+#define CALIB_BUF0_DEGC_CALI(x)	(((x) >> 1) & 0x3f)
+#define CALIB_BUF0_O_SLOPE(x)	(((x) >> 26) & 0x3f)
+

IMHO the above changes from defining CALIB_BUF1_ADC_GE(x) to CALIB_BUF0_O_SLOPE(x) can be avoided. We are just renaming the same defines to a generic name. Instead the macro starting with MT8173 can only be used wherever needed commonly both by 8173 instance and for
2701 instance.

+#define NVMEM_TS1	0
+#define NVMEM_TS2	1
+#define NVMEM_TS3	2
+#define NVMEM_TS4	3
+#define NVMEM_TS5	4
+
+/* MT2701 thermal sensors */
+#define MT2701_TS1	0
+#define MT2701_TS2	1
+#define MT2701_TSABB	2
+
+/* AUXADC channel 11 is used for the temperature sensors */
+#define MT2701_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL	11

  #define THERMAL_NAME    "mtk-thermal"

+/* Maximum support banks */
+#define MAX_NUM_BANK		5

Why is this 5?
Commit message states: MT8173 has four banks and five sensors, and MT2701 has only one bank and three sensors. Am i missing something here?

+
  struct mtk_thermal;

+struct thermal_bank_cfg {
+	unsigned int num_sensors;
+	unsigned int sensors[MAX_NUM_BANK];
+};
+
  struct mtk_thermal_bank {
  	struct mtk_thermal *mt;
  	int id;
  };

+struct mtk_thermal_sense_point {
+	int msr;
+	int adcpnp;
+};
+
+struct mtk_thermal_data {
+	struct thermal_bank_cfg bank_data[MAX_NUM_BANK];

So for MT8173 we are allocating one bank extra and for MT2701 we are allocating 4 banks extra right? Why not do something like this:

struct thermal_bank *banks_data
Assign the array based on the SoC type?

+	struct mtk_thermal_sense_point sensing_points[MAX_NUM_BANK];
+	int sensor_mux_values[MAX_NUM_BANK];
+	s32 num_banks;
+	s32 num_sensors;
+	s32 auxadc_channel;
+};
+
  struct mtk_thermal {
  	struct device *dev;
  	void __iomem *thermal_base;
@@ -133,27 +163,20 @@ struct mtk_thermal {
  	struct clk *clk_peri_therm;
  	struct clk *clk_auxadc;

-	struct mtk_thermal_bank banks[MT8173_NUM_ZONES];
-
+	struct mtk_thermal_bank banks[MAX_NUM_BANK];

Here again some extra memory allocation.

Why not keep a pointer which points to the desired array?

+	const struct mtk_thermal_data *conf;
  	/* lock: for getting and putting banks */
  	struct mutex lock;
+	struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;

  	/* Calibration values */
  	s32 adc_ge;
  	s32 degc_cali;
  	s32 o_slope;
-	s32 vts[MT8173_NUM_SENSORS];
-
-};
-
-struct mtk_thermal_bank_cfg {
-	unsigned int num_sensors;
-	unsigned int sensors[MT8173_NUM_SENSORS_PER_ZONE];
+	s32 vts[MAX_NUM_BANK];
  };

-static const int sensor_mux_values[MT8173_NUM_SENSORS] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 16 };
-
-/*
+/**
   * The MT8173 thermal controller has four banks. Each bank can read up to
   * four temperature sensors simultaneously. The MT8173 has a total of 5
   * temperature sensors. We use each bank to measure a certain area of the
@@ -166,42 +189,76 @@ static const int sensor_mux_values[MT8173_NUM_SENSORS] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 16 };
   * data, and this indeed needs the temperatures of the individual banks
   * for making better decisions.
   */
-static const struct mtk_thermal_bank_cfg bank_data[] = {
-	{
-		.num_sensors = 2,
-		.sensors = { MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TS3 },
-	}, {
-		.num_sensors = 2,
-		.sensors = { MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TS4 },
-	}, {
-		.num_sensors = 3,
-		.sensors = { MT8173_TS1, MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TSABB },
-	}, {
-		.num_sensors = 1,
-		.sensors = { MT8173_TS2 },
+static const struct mtk_thermal_data mt8173_thermal_data = {
+	.auxadc_channel = MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL,
+	.num_banks = 4,
+	.num_sensors = 5,
+	.bank_data = {
+		{
+			.num_sensors = 2,
+			.sensors = { MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TS3 },
+		}, {
+			.num_sensors = 2,
+			.sensors = { MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TS4 },
+		}, {
+			.num_sensors = 3,
+			.sensors = { MT8173_TS1, MT8173_TS2, MT8173_TSABB },
+		}, {
+			.num_sensors = 1,
+			.sensors = { MT8173_TS2 },
+		},
  	},
+	.sensing_points = {
+		{
+			.msr = TEMP_MSR0,
+			.adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP0,
+		}, {
+			.msr = TEMP_MSR1,
+			.adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP1,
+		}, {
+			.msr = TEMP_MSR2,
+			.adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP2,
+		}, {
+			.msr = TEMP_MSR3,
+			.adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP3,
+		},
+	},
+	.sensor_mux_values = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 16 },
  };

-struct mtk_thermal_sense_point {
-	int msr;
-	int adcpnp;
-};
-
-static const struct mtk_thermal_sense_point
-		sensing_points[MT8173_NUM_SENSORS_PER_ZONE] = {
-	{
-		.msr = TEMP_MSR0,
-		.adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP0,
-	}, {
-		.msr = TEMP_MSR1,
-		.adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP1,
-	}, {
-		.msr = TEMP_MSR2,
-		.adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP2,
-	}, {
-		.msr = TEMP_MSR3,
-		.adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP3,
+/**
+ * The MT2701 thermal controller has one bank, which can read up to
+ * three temperature sensors simultaneously. The MT2701 has a total of 3
+ * temperature sensors.
+ *
+ * The thermal core only gets the maximum temperature of this one bank,
+ * so the bank concept wouldn't be necessary here. However, the SVS (Smart
+ * Voltage Scaling) unit makes its decisions based on the same bank
+ * data.
+ */
+static const struct mtk_thermal_data mt2701_thermal_data = {
+	.auxadc_channel = MT2701_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL,
+	.num_banks = 1,
+	.num_sensors = 3,
+	.bank_data = {
+		{
+			.num_sensors = 3,
+			.sensors = { MT2701_TS1, MT2701_TS2, MT2701_TSABB },
+		},
  	},
+	.sensing_points = {
+		{
+			.msr = TEMP_MSR0,
+			.adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP0,
+		}, {
+			.msr = TEMP_MSR1,
+			.adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP1,
+		}, {
+			.msr = TEMP_MSR2,
+			.adcpnp = TEMP_ADCPNP2,
+		},
+	},
+	.sensor_mux_values = { 0, 1, 16},
  };

  /**
@@ -270,13 +327,15 @@ static void mtk_thermal_put_bank(struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank)
  static int mtk_thermal_bank_temperature(struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank)
  {
  	struct mtk_thermal *mt = bank->mt;
+	const struct mtk_thermal_data *conf = mt->conf;
  	int i, temp = INT_MIN, max = INT_MIN;
  	u32 raw;

-	for (i = 0; i < bank_data[bank->id].num_sensors; i++) {
-		raw = readl(mt->thermal_base + sensing_points[i].msr);
+	for (i = 0; i < conf->bank_data[bank->id].num_sensors; i++) {
+		raw = readl(mt->thermal_base + conf->sensing_points[i].msr);

-		temp = raw_to_mcelsius(mt, bank_data[bank->id].sensors[i], raw);
+		temp = raw_to_mcelsius(mt, conf->bank_data[bank->id].sensors[i],
+				       raw);

  		/*
  		 * The first read of a sensor often contains very high bogus
@@ -299,7 +358,7 @@ static int mtk_read_temp(void *data, int *temperature)
  	int i;
  	int tempmax = INT_MIN;

-	for (i = 0; i < MT8173_NUM_ZONES; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < mt->conf->num_banks; i++) {
  		struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank = &mt->banks[i];

  		mtk_thermal_get_bank(bank);
@@ -322,7 +381,7 @@ static void mtk_thermal_init_bank(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int num,
  				  u32 apmixed_phys_base, u32 auxadc_phys_base)
  {
  	struct mtk_thermal_bank *bank = &mt->banks[num];
-	const struct mtk_thermal_bank_cfg *cfg = &bank_data[num];
+	const struct mtk_thermal_data *conf = mt->conf;
  	int i;

  	bank->id = num;
@@ -368,7 +427,7 @@ static void mtk_thermal_init_bank(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int num,
  	 * this value will be stored to TEMP_PNPMUXADDR (TEMP_SPARE0)
  	 * automatically by hw
  	 */
-	writel(BIT(MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL), mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCMUX);
+	writel(BIT(conf->auxadc_channel), mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCMUX);

  	/* AHB address for auxadc mux selection */
  	writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_CON1_CLR_V,
@@ -379,18 +438,18 @@ static void mtk_thermal_init_bank(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int num,
  	       mt->thermal_base + TEMP_PNPMUXADDR);

  	/* AHB value for auxadc enable */
-	writel(BIT(MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL), mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCEN);
+	writel(BIT(conf->auxadc_channel), mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCEN);

  	/* AHB address for auxadc enable (channel 0 immediate mode selected) */
  	writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_CON1_SET_V,
  	       mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCENADDR);

  	/* AHB address for auxadc valid bit */
-	writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_DATA(MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL),
+	writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_DATA(conf->auxadc_channel),
  	       mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCVALIDADDR);

  	/* AHB address for auxadc voltage output */
-	writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_DATA(MT8173_TEMP_AUXADC_CHANNEL),
+	writel(auxadc_phys_base + AUXADC_DATA(conf->auxadc_channel),
  	       mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCVOLTADDR);

  	/* read valid & voltage are at the same register */
@@ -407,11 +466,12 @@ static void mtk_thermal_init_bank(struct mtk_thermal *mt, int num,
  	writel(TEMP_ADCWRITECTRL_ADC_MUX_WRITE,
  	       mt->thermal_base + TEMP_ADCWRITECTRL);

-	for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_sensors; i++)
-		writel(sensor_mux_values[cfg->sensors[i]],
-		       mt->thermal_base + sensing_points[i].adcpnp);
+	for (i = 0; i < conf->bank_data[num].num_sensors; i++)
+		writel(conf->sensor_mux_values[conf->bank_data[num].sensors[i]],
+		       mt->thermal_base + conf->sensing_points[i].adcpnp);

-	writel((1 << cfg->num_sensors) - 1, mt->thermal_base + TEMP_MONCTL0);
+	writel((1 << conf->bank_data[num].num_sensors) - 1,
+	       mt->thermal_base + TEMP_MONCTL0);

  	writel(TEMP_ADCWRITECTRL_ADC_PNP_WRITE |
  	       TEMP_ADCWRITECTRL_ADC_MUX_WRITE,
@@ -442,7 +502,7 @@ static int mtk_thermal_get_calibration_data(struct device *dev,

  	/* Start with default values */
  	mt->adc_ge = 512;
-	for (i = 0; i < MT8173_NUM_SENSORS; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < mt->conf->num_sensors; i++)
  		mt->vts[i] = 260;
  	mt->degc_cali = 40;
  	mt->o_slope = 0;
@@ -467,15 +527,15 @@ static int mtk_thermal_get_calibration_data(struct device *dev,
  		goto out;
  	}

-	if (buf[0] & MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VALID) {
-		mt->adc_ge = MT8173_CALIB_BUF1_ADC_GE(buf[1]);
-		mt->vts[MT8173_TS1] = MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS1(buf[0]);
-		mt->vts[MT8173_TS2] = MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS2(buf[0]);
-		mt->vts[MT8173_TS3] = MT8173_CALIB_BUF1_VTS_TS3(buf[1]);
-		mt->vts[MT8173_TS4] = MT8173_CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS4(buf[2]);
-		mt->vts[MT8173_TSABB] = MT8173_CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TSABB(buf[2]);
-		mt->degc_cali = MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_DEGC_CALI(buf[0]);
-		mt->o_slope = MT8173_CALIB_BUF0_O_SLOPE(buf[0]);
+	if (buf[0] & CALIB_BUF0_VALID) {
+		mt->adc_ge = CALIB_BUF1_ADC_GE(buf[1]);
+		mt->vts[NVMEM_TS1] = CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS1(buf[0]);
+		mt->vts[NVMEM_TS2] = CALIB_BUF0_VTS_TS2(buf[0]);
+		mt->vts[NVMEM_TS3] = CALIB_BUF1_VTS_TS3(buf[1]);
+		mt->vts[NVMEM_TS4] = CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS4(buf[1]);
+		mt->vts[NVMEM_TS5] = CALIB_BUF2_VTS_TS5(buf[2]);
+		mt->degc_cali = CALIB_BUF0_DEGC_CALI(buf[0]);
+		mt->o_slope = CALIB_BUF0_O_SLOPE(buf[0]);

I guess even the above code changes can be avoided if we just retain macros starting with MT8173?

Best Regards,
Keerthy

  	} else {
  		dev_info(dev, "Device not calibrated, using default calibration values\n");
  	}
@@ -486,18 +546,36 @@ out:
  	return ret;
  }

+static const struct of_device_id mtk_thermal_of_match[] = {
+	{
+		.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-thermal",
+		.data = (void *)&mt8173_thermal_data,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-thermal",
+		.data = (void *)&mt2701_thermal_data,
+	}, {
+	},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_thermal_of_match);
+
  static int mtk_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
  	int ret, i;
  	struct device_node *auxadc, *apmixedsys, *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
  	struct mtk_thermal *mt;
  	struct resource *res;
+	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
  	u64 auxadc_phys_base, apmixed_phys_base;

  	mt = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mt), GFP_KERNEL);
  	if (!mt)
  		return -ENOMEM;

+	of_id = of_match_device(mtk_thermal_of_match, &pdev->dev);
+	if (of_id)
+		mt->conf = (const struct mtk_thermal_data *)of_id->data;
+
  	mt->clk_peri_therm = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "therm");
  	if (IS_ERR(mt->clk_peri_therm))
  		return PTR_ERR(mt->clk_peri_therm);
@@ -565,7 +643,7 @@ static int mtk_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  		goto err_disable_clk_auxadc;
  	}

-	for (i = 0; i < MT8173_NUM_ZONES; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < mt->conf->num_banks; i++)
  		mtk_thermal_init_bank(mt, i, apmixed_phys_base,
  				      auxadc_phys_base);

@@ -592,13 +670,6 @@ static int mtk_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	return 0;
  }

-static const struct of_device_id mtk_thermal_of_match[] = {
-	{
-		.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-thermal",
-	}, {
-	},
-};
-
  static struct platform_driver mtk_thermal_driver = {
  	.probe = mtk_thermal_probe,
  	.remove = mtk_thermal_remove,
@@ -610,6 +681,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mtk_thermal_driver = {

  module_platform_driver(mtk_thermal_driver);

+MODULE_AUTHOR("Dawei Chien <dawei.chien@xxxxxxxxxxxx>");
  MODULE_AUTHOR("Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>");
  MODULE_AUTHOR("Hanyi Wu <hanyi.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>");
  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Mediatek thermal driver");

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux