On 1.7.2016 07:37, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 02:50:57 +0200 > Ondřej Jirman <megous@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Since this is really specific, I guess you could simply make the >>> clk_ops for the nkmp clocks public, and just re-implement set_rate >>> using that logic. >> >> I would argue that this may be necessary for other PLL clocks too, if >> you can get out of bounds output frequency, by changing the dividers too >> early or too late. So perhaps this code should be generalized for other >> PLL clocks too, instead. > > The documentation says that only the CPU and DDR PLLs can be dynamically > changed after boot. The question is what exactly is meant by after boot. :) Anyway, if the kernel has no business changing some other PLLs, if there's code for changing them, should it be dropped? regards, Ondrej
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
