Am Donnerstag, 30. Juni 2016, 15:32:01 schrieb Doug Anderson: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> It looks like there are also more power domains that you haven't > >> listed here (like PD_GMAC, for instance, or PD_CORE_L). Are you > >> planning to add those in a followon patch? > > > > that reminds me, nodes with a reg property should have the base address > > in the node name as well. Using the constant works nicely, as can be > > seen on> > > the rk3288 where we have for example: > > pd_vio@RK3288_PD_VIO > > I was wondering about that. The device tree bindings are similarly > missing the reg from the example. > > I'm curious: for sorting purposes, are you supposed to know the > underlying integer and use that for sorting, or sort by the name of > the #define? requiring the underlying integer sounds very cumbersome, especially as the sorting is only a style-thing. So personally I'd take the constants name as sorting criteria, as everything else would be somewhat counter-intuitive. Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
