RE: [PATCH 1/2] drm/fsl-dcu: update the panel dt binding document

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> >>  Optional properties:
> >>  - fsl,tcon:		The phandle to the timing controller node.
> >> @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ dcu: dcu@2ce0000 {
> >>  	clocks = <&platform_clk 0>, <&platform_clk 0>;
> >>  	clock-names = "dcu", "pix";
> >>  	big-endian;
> >> -	fsl,panel = <&panel>;
> >>  	fsl,tcon = <&tcon>;
> >> +
> >> +	port: port@0 {
> >
> > Drop the unit address. With that,
> 
> I was going to say add a corresponding reg property and specify address-cells.
> 

For now, we only have one 'remote-endpoint', you mean maybe we should
use 'ports' that prepare for multiple connections?

> So is it ok to also create a port without address?
> 

It works fine, I think it is ok.

Best Regards,
Meng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux