Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: sunxi: Add a driver for the CCU

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Quoting Maxime Ripard (2016-06-28 13:45:02)
> What's the point of this, if we're not using (or exposing for that
> matter) any of it?
> 
> I'm sorry, but the whole point of the initial serie was to rework and
> simplify things, precisely because dealing with the clk_factors code
> was just too difficult nowadays. And this doesn't solve anything on
> that aspect.
> 
> We came with an approach that have all the maintainers involved
> agreeing on it, I don't see why we should start over. There's some
> useful features there (like tracing). But it's something that can be
> added, and should be done differently anyway.

Yes, let's not delay Maxime's work any longer. Stephen and I have
requested these changes to the sunxi clock drivers for a long time and
now we have them. I intend to merge Maxime's v3 once it addresses the
last round of review questions.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Maxime
> 
> -- 
> Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux